TIme magazine's man of the year is the American Solider. I'm sorry but that's just dumb.
Why isn't Saddam the man of the year? His name was spoken more often than any other. Rumors, news, searches, playing cards, blah blah blah. Time magazine has copped out. Big time.
Hitler was the Time's man of the year in 1938, you know. That was ballsy if you ask me, especially in those times. Folks didn't question the media and government as much as they do now. There seemed to be a "feel good - everything's ok" tune to war reporting. Now there are so many people judging and reporting on what's being reported, the news is a joke. To get decent news coverage, you have to watch overseas broadcasts.
The media is tired, desperate and out of ideas.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home